Logo

Pharmacist Interventions and Drug-Related Problems in CVD Patients: An ECPIS-Based Study

Author(s):
Farah A. KareemFarah A. KareemFarah A. Kareem ORCID1,*, Mohammed Y. JamalMohammed Y. JamalMohammed Y. Jamal ORCID2
1Ministry of Health and Environment, Al-Karkh Health Directorate, Alfurat General Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq
2Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

Shiraz E-Medical Journal:Vol. 26, issue 7; e158959
Published online:Jun 11, 2025
Article type:Research Article
Received:Dec 19, 2024
Accepted:Jun 01, 2025
How to Cite:A. Kareem F, Y. Jamal M. Pharmacist Interventions and Drug-Related Problems in CVD Patients: An ECPIS-Based Study.Shiraz E-Med J.2025;26(7):e158959.https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-158959.

Abstract

Background:

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are rapidly becoming an alarming and more common reason for morbidity and mortality. Drug-related problems (DRPs) are more common among hospitalized patients, and they can increase patient morbidity and mortality.

Objectives:

The present study aimed to investigate the effect of pharmacist interventions on DRPs using the Electronic Clinical Pharmacists Intervention Sheet (ECPIS) in patients with CVDs.

Methods:

A prospective study conducted in Iraq - Baghdad at Ibn-AL-Bitar Center for Cardiac Surgery, in 2024 for 5 months (from January to May), used the ECPIS. The hospital pharmacists who participated in this study were 10 out of 30 pharmacists who worked in the three internal cardiology wards. The pharmacists' hospital screened the files of patients from the first day of admission and follow-up until discharge. They reviewed patients' medication to identify DRPs and medication errors, and the classification of DRPs was conducted by the ECPIS, which is implemented in all Iraqi hospitals. They also documented the interventions made by pharmacists to address these problems.

Results:

The total number of drugs that caused problems detected by the pharmacists was 187. Proton pump inhibitors were the most frequent drugs found (16.6%), followed by heparin (14.4%), and antibiotics (11.8%). A total of 175 problems were detected, with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) being the most common problem detected (52.6%). The acceptance of interventions provided by the pharmacists to the physicians was 82.9%, while the not accepted interventions were 17.1%.

Conclusions:

This study highlights the importance of pharmacist involvement in identifying and preventing DRPs in patients with CVDs. Pharmacist interventions were frequently successful, demonstrating their role in improving patient safety.

1. Background

Any incident or circumstance involving drug therapy that prevents or may prevent the patient from receiving the best possible medical care is considered a drug-related problem (DRP) (1). Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) is a common term used to describe conditions related to the heart (2). Cardiovascular diseases are rapidly becoming an alarming and more common reason for morbidity and mortality (3). Reports from 2016 indicate that on a global scale, 17.9 million fatalities were caused by CVD, which is 31% of all deaths (4). In the 2018 World Health Organization (WHO) report, Iraq had 11,205 registered deaths (6.53%) caused by stroke and 32,463 deaths (18.92%) caused by coronary heart disease (HD) (world health rankings, 2021). In 2019, the ministry of health (MOH) in Iraq reported that 27% of total deaths are (5). Drug-related problems are more common among hospitalized patients, and they can increase patient morbidity and mortality. Compared to outpatients with CVDs, hospitalized patients experienced DRPs nearly three times as frequently (6). When it comes to collaborating with other medical professionals on patient care, clinical pharmacists have a significant role to play. Numerous studies have demonstrated that pharmaceutical treatment (dose adjustments, monitoring drug interactions, ensuring adherence to medication regimens, and correct management of the drugs) lowers problems related to medication (PRM) status by 50 - 80% by lowering maintenance expenses, the number of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and hospital stay duration (7). Pharmacists who actively evaluate patients' responses help raise patient adherence and satisfaction, reduce the number of medications given, medication-related issues, and prescription-related expenses (8). The part played by the pharmacists is vital to drug monitoring and dosage adjustment. Therefore, they play a major role in all the hospital departments, in general, and in the coronary care unit (CCU), in particular, in maintaining patient safety (9). The study conducted at a public cardiac center in Iraq in 2018 by Jabria et al. demonstrated that the important discharge drugs prescribed by cardiologists for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were significantly improved by pharmacists' intervention, potentially leading to better patient outcomes and reducing the number of potential prescribing problems (4). This study is the first of its kind as a prospective study, employing the ECPIS classification system to classify therapeutic problems and errors, focusing on enhancing clinical outcomes (Appendix 1 in Supplementary File).

2. Objectives

The present study aimed to reveal the effect of pharmacist interventions on DRPs by using the Electronic Clinical Pharmacists Intervention Sheet (ECPIS) in patients with CVDs.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Design and Setting

The present study was a prospective study conducted in Iraq - Baghdad at Ibn-AL-Bitar Center for Cardiac Surgery, in 2024 for 5 months (from January to May).

3.2. Participants Identification and Recruitment

The pharmacists in the hospital detected DRPs in 97 patients. The patients involved in this study were > 18 years old who suffered from CVDs. The hospital pharmacists who participated in this study were 10 out of 30 pharmacists, two pharmacists who graduated from the post-graduated year clinical pharmacy program (PGY2) specializing in anticoagulants, two pharmacists who completed their internship year, and six pharmacists currently in their internship year.

3.3. Drug-Related Problems Classification Tool

This study used the ECPIS. A classification released by the MoH in 2019, the ECPIS, is an electronic program created by the information technology (IT) center in partnership with the clinical pharmacy section of the directorate of technical affairs (10). The ECPIS consists of 10 problems and 9 types of pharmacist action to solve the problems. Doctors' responses to interventions were also determined. The medication errors report form is a part of the ECPIS, which categorizes medication errors into four categories (prescribing, transcription, administration, and monitoring). There were four categories of the causes of medication errors (patient knowledge deficiency, medication knowledge deficiency, non-adherence to policies and procedures, and miscellaneous). Each of these categories has subcategories.

3.4. Data Collection

The pharmacists' hospitall screened patients' files in the cardiology wards from the first day of admission and follow-up until discharge. They reviewed patients' medication to identify DRPs and medication errors. The pharmacists identified DRPs and proposed appropriate interventions to the physicians. During the morning tour, these interventions were discussed face-to-face, and the pharmacists recorded whether the physician accepted and implemented them or not. The classification of DRPs was conducted by the ECPIS, which is implemented in all Iraqi hospitals. They also documented the interventions made by pharmacists to address these problems. The collected data post-interventions aimed to capture the outcomes more comprehensively and ensure that the effects of the intervention were adequately observed and recorded. Patient treatments were assessed based on the most recent therapeutic strategies recommended in the evidence-based guidelines (European Society of Cardiology 2021). The interventions included patient education, medication dose adjustment, and stopping medications. The acceptance of these interventions by physicians was also assessed.

3.5. Inclusion Criteria

(1) Patients >18 years old.

(2) Patients residents in the internal cardiology hospital wards with medication-related problems or errors.

3.6. Exclusion Criteria

(1) Patients younger than 18 years of age.

(2) Patients admitted to surgical cardiology wards.

(3) Patients without identified DRPs.

(4) Patients unwilling to participate in this study.

3.7. Data Analysis

The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 25. Descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) were conducted for all study items.

4. Results

The study sample involved 97 patients with a mean age of 57.94 years. Of these, 66 (68.0%) patients were male, 31 (32.0%) patients were female, 91 (93.8%) of patients were married, 5 (5.2%) of patients were single, 57.7% of patients were unemployed, and 24.7% of patients were retired, as shown in (Table 1). Patients in this study suffered from ischemic heart disease (IHD), heart failure (HF), diabetes mellitus (DM), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (59.8%, 37.1%, 26.8%, 21.6%) respectively, as seen in (Table 2). The total drugs that caused problems detected by the pharmacists were 187. Proton pump inhibitors were the most frequent drugs found (16.6%), followed by heparin (14.4%), and antibiotics (11.8%), as seen in (Table 3). The total number of problems detected by the pharmacists was 175. Adverse drug reaction was the most problem detected (52.6%), and there were 45.7% of problems unclassified, as seen in (Table 4). There were 175 causes of problems detected by the pharmacists according to ECPIS. Unavailable drugs were the most common cause of the problem detected (25.7%), followed by no monitoring (25.1%), no adherence (15.4%), and drug-drug interaction (11.4%), as seen in (Table 5). The most frequently prescribed unavailable drugs in the hospital detected were pantoprazole (31.1%), bisoprolol (28.9%), and warfarin (28.9%), as seen in (Table 6). Some drugs needed frequent monitoring, and the most common missed monitoring tests were activated partial thromboplastin time (50.0%), kidney function tests (22.7%), and electrolyte (18.2%), as seen in (Table 7). The pharmacists provided 140 planned interventions to the physicians and patients. Suggest monitoring (31.4%) was the most frequent intervention provided, followed by suggesting an alternative (17.9%), patient education (17.1%), and stopping the drug (10.7%), as shown in (Table 8). The acceptance of interventions provided by the pharmacists to the physicians was 82.9%, while the not accepted interventions were 17.1%, as seen in (Table 8).

Table 1.Demographic Data of Patients
Item Name and CategoriesValues a
Gender
Male66 (68.0)
Female31 (32.0)
Age in years57.94 ± 13.984
Hospitalization days8.46 ± 10.244
Social state
Married91 (93.8)
Single5 (5.2)
Divorced1 (1.0)
Education level
Primary education34 (35.1)
Secondary education22 (22.7)
No formal education21 (21.6)
Bachelor's degree15 (15.5)
Others5 (5.2)
Place of residence
Baghdad74 (76.3)
Diyala5 (5.2)
Babil4 (4.1)
Al-Anbar5 (5.2)
Wasit3 (3.1)
Salah-Alden4 (4.1)
Others2 (2.0)
Employment status
Unemployed56 (57.7)
Retired24 (24.7)
Employed17 (17.5)

Demographic Data of Patients

Table 2.Diagnosis of Patients with Drug-Related Problems
Item Name and SubcategoryValues a
Diagnosis
IHD58 (59.8)
HF36 (37.1)
DM26 (26.8)
CKD21(21.6)
AF12 (12.4)
Valvular HD15 (15.5)
Venous thromboembolism6 (6.2)
Anasarca3 (3.1)
VF3 (3.1)
Liver impairment3 (3.1)
Shock1 (1.0)
Others5 (5.2)

Diagnosis of Patients with Drug-Related Problems

Table 3.Drugs That Caused Problems Were Detected by the Pharmacists
Item Name and SubcategoryValues a
Drugs related problem
PPI31 (16.6)
Heparin27 (14.4)
Antibiotic22 (11.8)
Beta-blockers16 (8.6)
Antiplatelet16 (8.6)
Warfarin15 (8.0)
Antiarrhythmic drugs12 (6.4)
Lasix10 (5.3)
Statins8 (4.3)
Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors5 (2.7)
Ivabradine3 (1.6)
Potassium sparing diuretic3 (1.6)
Calcium amp2 (1.1)
Calcium channel blockers2 (1.1)
Miscellaneous (non-cardiovascular drugs)9 (4.8)
Miscellaneous (cardiovascular drugs)6 (3.2)

Drugs That Caused Problems Were Detected by the Pharmacists

Table 4.Problems Were Found by the Pharmacists According to Electronic Clinical Pharmacists Intervention Sheet
ProblemValues a
ADR92 (52.6)
Prescription written for wrong drug3 (1.7)
Unclassified problems 80 (45.7)
Total 175 (100)

Problems Were Found by the Pharmacists According to Electronic Clinical Pharmacists Intervention Sheet

Table 5.The Causes of Problems Found by the Pharmacists
Item NameValues a
Unavailable drug45 (25.7)
No monitoring44 (25.1)
Not adherence 27 (15.4)
Drug-drug interaction20 (11.4)
Drug food interaction5 (2.9)
Dosing frequency 4 (2.3)
Prescription written for wrong drug 3 (1.7)
Unclassified causes27 (15.4)

The Causes of Problems Found by the Pharmacists

Table 6.Unavailable Drugs in the Hospital Were Detected
Unavailable DrugValues a
Pantoprazole 14 (31.1)
Bisoprolol 13 (28.9)
Warfarin 9 (20)
Amiodarone 5 (11.1)
Levofloxacin 2 (4.4)
Candesartan 1 (2.2)
Isosorbide dinitrate 1 (2.2)

Unavailable Drugs in the Hospital Were Detected

Table 7.Drug-Related Problems Are Caused by No Monitoring
No Monitoring Values a
Activated partial thromboplastin time22 (50.0)
Kidney function test10 (22.7)
Electrolyte 8 (18.2)
INR4 (9.1)

Drug-Related Problems Are Caused by No Monitoring

Table 8.Planned Intervention Was Provided to the Physician and Patient by the Pharmacists, and Interventions Acceptance Status by the Physician
Planned InterventionsValues a
Suggest monitoring 44 (31.4)
Suggest alternative 25 (17.9)
Patient education24 (17.1)
Stop the drug15 (10.7)
Instruction for used changed13 (9.3)
Correct the dose11 (7.9)
Nurse education6 (4.3)
Food correction 2 (1.4)
Intervention accepted116 (82.9)
Intervention not accepted24 (17.1)

Planned Intervention Was Provided to the Physician and Patient by the Pharmacists, and Interventions Acceptance Status by the Physician

5. Discussion

Drugs can be a significant contributing factor to DRPs, even while drug therapy has positive outcomes like lowering symptoms and enhancing the quality of life (11). The pharmacist enhances organizational structures by ensuring safe and effective medication therapy. Drug-related problems and medication errors can be identified, addressed, and prevented by pharmacists with their level of experience. These procedures have been shown to have a beneficial effect on patient safety (12). A variety of DRPs can arise in individuals using cardiovascular medicines (13, 14). Male patients were significantly more likely than female patients to have CVDs in this study; a study by Naser Safaie et al. in Iran found that male patients were 73% and female patients were 27% (15). This could be due to the fact that males are more likely than females to engage in unhealthy habits and lifestyles like heavy drinking, smoking, and stressful work. Ischemic heart disease and HF were the most common reasons for hospitalization because they require several medications to manage the illness, prevent complications, and improve quality of life. Additionally, many patients with HD also have other health problems like diabetes or kidney disease. The most DRPs found with PPI (pantoprazole, omeprazole), heparin, and antibiotics (azithromycin, levofloxacin, ceftriaxone). Patients who take omeprazole (PPI that inhibits cytochrome P450 2C19) along with clopidogrel have a higher chance of developing ischemic stroke because omeprazole has a higher inhibitory potency compared to the other PPI class members. Omeprazole use dramatically decreased the antiplatelet action of clopidogrel in high-risk individuals receiving clopidogrel treatment (16). In this study, the second drug with the most frequent DRPs was heparin, where the dose was too low, and the dosage regimen was too frequent. Another problem found was a combination of heparin (or enoxaparin) with ceftriaxone, which led to increasing prothrombin time. The (enoxaparin-ceftriaxone) drug interaction was also detected in a study done in India by Biradar et al. in 2022, which constituted 10.7% of the total drug-drug interactions detected in this study (17). Another interaction reported in the current study was between ceftriaxone and calcium gluconate, which will lead to the precipitation of calcium in the kidney and lung, causing organ failure. These results are supported by a study conducted in Iraq in 2015 by Al-Jumaili et al., where this interaction was one of the most serious interactions found (18). The medications azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, and chloroquine were frequently used to treat coronavirus illness 2019. These medications have a history of causing torsades de pointes and prolonging the QT interval (19). Like this study, the ADRs (54%) of these problems were identified in a study conducted in Cyprus in 2016 by Gökçekuş et al. (20). This finding contrasted with research by Celin et al., where the most common DRP was found to be drug interaction, which accounted for 25.0% of total DRPs, followed by drug use without indication (15.0%) and ADR (15.0%) (21). The most common cause of problems found in this study was "prescribed drugs not available, no monitoring". These results contradict that of a study done in 2014 in India, where the major DRPs were sub-therapeutic dose, overdose, and drug use without indications (22). A possible explanation for prescribing drugs that are not available may be that many essential drugs are not supplied or provided in small quantities by the State Company for Marketing Drugs and Medical Appliances (KIMADIA), but sub-purchasing committees purchase them within the hospital depending on financial allocation. KIMADIA is a governmental entity in Iraq that works under the regulation of the Iraqi MoH and is responsible for the procurement, storage, and distribution of drugs, medical supplies, and equipment for use in public health facilities, such as public hospitals and primary care settings, throughout all 18 provinces of Iraq (23). "Suggest monitoring" and "suggest alternative" were the most common interventions provided by the pharmacists, while in a study conducted by Biradar et al. in India, there were 204 DRPs found, and the team offered 74 interventions for them, comprising 30 (41.6%) drug withdrawals, 24 (33.3%) new drug additions, 4 (5.55%) dosage form changes, and 14 (19.4%) dose reductions (17). As in this study, a study conducted by Ukoha-Kalu et al. in Nigeria found that the majority of interventions (586, 91.0%) were accepted (24), and another study conducted by Wattanaruengchai et al. found that out of 790 interventions, 770 (97.4%) were accepted (25).

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Javedh S, Sandeep B, C. Shastry. Assessment of Drug Related Problems in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital. J Pharm Care. 2015;2(2).
  • 2.
    Nyamagoud SB, Swamy AHV, Netalakar A, Bhoomika SK, Namratha D, Kurabanavar TK. Identification of DRPs and Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Cardiovascular Patients in Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital. Int J Pharm Investigation. 2024;14(2):454-61. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijpi.14.2.55.
  • 3.
    Salman BO, Jamal MY, Hussein FH, Younus MM. Medications that Cause Cardiac Adverse Reaction in Iraqi Patients: a Qualitative Study. Latin Am J Pharm. 2023;42:252-61.
  • 4.
    Jabri AM, Assad HC, Al-Jumaili AA. Pharmacist role to enhance the prescribing of hospital discharge medications for patients after heart attack. Saudi Pharm J. 2020;28(4):473-9. [PubMed ID: 32273807]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7132602]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2020.02.009.
  • 5.
    World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs): Fact sheet no. 317. World Heal Organ. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds).
  • 6.
    Ahmed KO, Muddather HF, Yousef BA. Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) drug-related problems classification version 9.1: first implementation in Sudan. J Pharm Res Int. 2021;33(59A).
  • 7.
    Taner N, Berk B. A prospective study concerning the effect of pharmaceutical care services on patients with heart failure. Clin Experim Health Sci. 2022;12(4):853-9. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.895693.
  • 8.
    Mohammed SI, Dawood EB, Abaas IS. Perceptions and attitudes of community pharmacists towards patient counseling and continuing pharmacy education programs in Iraq. Iraqi J Pharm Sci. 2019;28(2):30-6. https://doi.org/10.31351/vol28iss2pp30-36.
  • 9.
    Saihood AH, Hasan AF. Assessment of the Clinical Pharmacists' Role by Physicians at Baghdad Hospitals. Iraqi J Pharm Sci. 2020;29(2):194-201. https://doi.org/10.31351/vol29iss2pp194-201.
  • 10.
    Kadhim Al-Jawadi H, Waleed Al-Kamil G, Awad Hussein E. Electronic documentation of clinical pharmacists' interventions in iraqi hospitals-a focus on patient safety. Europ J Pharm Med Res. 2015;9.
  • 11.
    Huiskes VJB, van den Ende CHM, Kruijtbosch M, Ensing HT, Meijs M, Meijs VMM, et al. Effectiveness of medication review on the number of drug-related problems in patients visiting the outpatient cardiology clinic: A randomized controlled trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;86(1):50-61. [PubMed ID: 31663156]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6983519]. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14125.
  • 12.
    Tefera GM, Zeleke AZ, Jima YM, Kebede TM. Drug Therapy Problems and the Role of Clinical Pharmacist in Surgery Ward: Prospective Observational and Interventional Study. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2020;12:71-83. [PubMed ID: 32440225]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7210033]. https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S251200.
  • 13.
    Gelchu T, Abdela J. Drug therapy problems among patients with cardiovascular disease admitted to the medical ward and had a follow-up at the ambulatory clinic of Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital: The case of a tertiary hospital in eastern Ethiopia. SAGE Open Med. 2019;7:2050312119860400. [PubMed ID: 31367379]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6643177]. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312119860401.
  • 14.
    Nascimento A, Leopoldino RWD, Santos M, Costa TXD, Martins RR. Drug-Related Problems in Cardiac Neonates under Intensive Care. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2020;38. e2018134. [PubMed ID: 31939506]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6958545]. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2020/38/2018134.
  • 15.
    Safaie N, Azizi H, Khiali S, Entezari-Maleki T. The Impact of Clinical Pharmacist Interventions on Medication Errors Management in the Postoperative Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. Pharm Sci. 2020;27(3):433-8. https://doi.org/10.34172/ps.2020.88.
  • 16.
    Chang CC, Chou YC, Chang JY, Sun CA. Effects of treatment with clopidogrel with or without proton pump inhibitor omeprazole on the risk of ischemic stroke: a nationwide cohort study. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):1686. [PubMed ID: 38242975]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10798965]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51682-8.
  • 17.
    Biradar SM, Kohima B, Nayak V, Nandikol S, Warad V, Byakod SM, et al. Assessment of Drug Related Problems and Pharmacist Interventions in Inpatients with Cardiovascular Disease. Rational Pharm Cardiol. 2022;18(5):536-43. https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2022-10-07.
  • 18.
    Al-Jumaili AAA, Jabri AM, Al-Rekabi MD, Abbood SK, Hussein AH. Physician Acceptance of Pharmacist Recommendations about Medication Prescribing Errors in Iraqi Hospitals. Innov Pharm. 2016;7(3). https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v7i3.443.
  • 19.
    Tisdale JE, Chung MK, Campbell KB, Hammadah M, Joglar JA, Leclerc J, et al. Drug-Induced Arrhythmias: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142(15):e214-33. [PubMed ID: 32929996]. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000905.
  • 20.
    Gökçekuş L, Mestrovic A, Basgut B. Pharmacist intervention in drug-related problems for patients with cardiovascular diseases in selected community pharmacies in Northern Cyprus. Tropical J Pharm Res. 2016;15(10). https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v15i10.29.
  • 21.
    Celin AT, Seuma J, Ramesh A. Assessment of drug related problems in stroke patients admitted to a South Indian tertiary care teaching hospital. Indian J Pharm Practice. 2012;5(4).
  • 22.
    Ragesh G, Sindhubharathi A, Ushasri M, Srinivasulu A. A Study on Assessment Of Clinical Pharmacy Services To Cardiology Department In Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital. Hypertension. 2015;6:11-32.
  • 23.
    Al-Jumaili AA, Younus MM, Kannan YJA, Nooruldeen ZE, Al-Nuseirat A. Pharmaceutical regulations in Iraq: from medicine approval to postmarketing. East Mediterr Health J. 2021;27(10):1007-15. [PubMed ID: 34766327]. https://doi.org/10.26719/emhj.21.025.
  • 24.
    Ukoha-kalu BO, Adibe MO, Ukwe CV. Identification and resolution of drug therapy problems among hypertensive patients receiving care in a Nigerian Hospital-A pilot study. Ann Clin Hypertension. 2020;4(1):20-3.
  • 25.
    Wattanaruengchai P, Kongwatcharapong J, Nathisuwan S. Characterization of drug‐related problems and evaluation of pharmacist interventions in the cardiovascular intensive care settings in Thailand. J Am College Clin Pharm. 2023;6(5):488-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1779.
comments

Leave a comment here


Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles